Colorado Marijuana News
The former owner of The Meatball Shack has submitted an application to open the city’s eighth recreational marijuana dispensary in the downtown core.
Michael Gurtman, who shut down The Meatball Shack last month after four and a half years, said the new dispensary, if approved by the state and city, will be called “Best Day Ever,” and will be located on the second floor of the same building on Cooper Avenue that houses the Silverpeak Apothecary dispensary.Learn more »
EAGLE-VAIL — A new recreational marijuana shop, High Country Healing, has opened on the “Green Mile” along U.S. Highway 6.
The shop will hold a grand opening celebration Jan. 22 with food, live music and specials throughout the store. Together with a local development company, the shop is next to the Route 6 Café in Eagle-Vail.Learn more »
EAGLE COUNTY — Skiing is king in the Vail Valley — always has been. But will it always be so?
Winter sports will probably always dominate the Vail Valley’s economy. Despite years of effort, the town of Vail collects about 70 percent of its annual sales taxes during the ski season. That could change in the future, and perhaps the near future.Learn more »
The last of a series of marijuana business applications to go through the former city of Glenwood Springs licensing review process before new rules were enacted this summer got the green light to proceed from City Council Thursday night.
Council voted 6-1 to uphold city licensing officer Angela Roff’s decision last month to grant licenses for Osiris LLC to operate a cultivation, manufacturing and retail marijuana sales facility at 2150 Devereux Road.Learn more »
The Glenwood Springs Chamber Resort Association and Garfield County Public Library District have teamed up to appeal the recent city decision to grant a license for a new downtown marijuana shop.
The chamber and library boards on Friday issued an appeal to Glenwood Springs City Council regarding license hearing officer Angela Roff’s Oct. 9 decision to approve the Kind Castle retail marijuana store at 818 Grand Ave.Learn more »
Jordan Lewis said he was “literally betting the farm” on his pot-growing facility near Basalt. The gamble paid off — for the time being at least.
Pitkin County commissioners voted 4-1 Wednesday to renew separate, one-year licenses for High Valley Farms, which is co-owned by Lewis and is the cannabis supplier to Silverpeak Apothecary in Aspen and other marijuana dispensaries in Colorado.Learn more »
EAGLE COUNTY — Marijuana enthusiasts can add one more holiday to their calendars. On Sept. 16, recreational pot will be sold without state-added taxes.
Those taxes were approved by voters in 2013, a year after the state approved a constitutional amendment legalizing the possession and retail sale of marijuana for recreational purposes. Since revenue has exceeded projections in the ballot measure, refunds are being given in the form of a one-day price break.Learn more »
The city of Glenwood Springs has completed new rules for marijuana businesses, including the addition of a special-use review and hearing process, and an expanded 900-foot setback between retail pot shops and related businesses.
City Council on Thursday approved the amended ordinance without any further discussion or public comment. The issue was aired during an Aug. 6 public hearing when council agreed to the new rules on first reading.Learn more »
A Denver-based cannabis company that already owns a retail and medical marijuana operation in Glenwood Springs won local approval Wednesday to acquire the Green Dragon’s local holdings.
Greenwerkz already received approval in May from Aspen’s licensing authority for a transfer of ownership involving the Green Dragon retail store and medical dispensary in Aspen.Learn more »
New marijuana businesses in Glenwood Springs will face a special planning review to make sure the proposed location is suitable, and will have to be separated by at least 900 feet.
Those are the new rules that won initial approval Thursday night on a 6-1 vote by Glenwood Springs City Council.Learn more »
New marijuana businesses in Glenwood Springs will face a special planning review to make sure the proposed location is suitable, and will have to be separated by at least 900 feet.
Those are the new rules that won initial approval Thursday night on a 6-1 vote by Glenwood Springs City Council.Learn more »
A ban on new marijuana businesses in the downtown core, a special permit review that would involve the city’s planning commission and a greatly increased 900-foot setback between shops are among options before Glenwood Springs City Council this Thursday.
The options were among the ideas discussed at a council work session in early July regarding possible revisions to the city’s existing licensing and land-use regulations for retail and medical marijuana businesses.Learn more »
VAIL — The temporary ban on retail marijuana in Vail could be permanent in a matter of weeks.
Just two weeks after the Vail Town Council passed yet another extension of a 2014 moratorium banning marijuana businesses, the council Tuesday night will consider the first reading of a permanent ban. That ban could be overturned by a future town council.Learn more »
Government Tracker: Vail extends pot banJuly 9, 2015 —
Board: Vail Town Council, July 7 evening meeting.
Present: Jenn Bruno, Greg Moffet, Ludwig Kurz, Mayor Andy Daly, Margaret Rogers, Dave Chapin, Dale Bugby.
Issue: Second reading of an ordinance creating a 60-day extention of the town’s current moratorium on retail marijuana sales.
How they voted: 7-0 to approve.
Why was this needed? The town has temporarily banned retail sales of marijuana since the 2012 passage of Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use and sales in Colorado. The current ban was set to expire, and town officials say they need more time to consider taking final action.
What’s likely to happen? While Rogers said she still wants more information — revenue collected, crime statistics and similar data — from other mountain towns about the pros and cons of retail marijuana sales, a majority of the council indicated they’ve learned enough. Chapin also proposed imposing a permanent ban before the current extension expires. Amendment 64 gave towns and counties the power to enforce bans on sales and growing, although personal use in private areas remains legal.
“The Vail brand is immensely invaluable,” Chapin said, adding that there are numerous sales outlets between Denver and Vail, as well as several stores in nearby Eagle-Vail.
Daly, long an advocate of a permanent ban, agreed with Chapin, saying “I don’t care” what’s going on in other communities.
“Aspen needs to do what’s right for Aspen, and we need to do what’s right for Vail,” Daly said.
What’s next? Town attorney Matt Mire will draft a proposed ordinance imposing a permanent ban on retail sales. Expect a vote before the current moratorium extension expires Oct. 6.
Vail extends pot moratoriumJune 17, 2015 —
VAIL — The Vail Town Council Tuesday again extended a temporary ban on retail marijuana sales in town. But the days may be numbered for the temporary ban.
Council members voted unanimously Tuesday to approve on first reading an ordinance extending the ban for another 60 days. The council will probably give final approval to the ordinance at its July 7 meeting.
George Ruther, director of the town’s community development department, told council members that extending the ban will give town staff a chance to collect council-requested research about the state’s retail marijuana business. The temporary ban means no one can apply for a retail license in town during that period.
Vail banned medical marijuana shops before the 2012 passage of Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana use and established a framework for legal retail sales. While the measure passed statewide with nearly 55 percent of the vote, the margin was closer to 2:1 in Eagle County, and greater still in Vail.
Despite that popular support, only one town, Eagle, currently allows retail or medical marijuana sales. The rest of the business is conducted in unincorporated Eagle County, with most businesses now operating in Eagle-Vail along a stretch of U.S. Highway 6 some have called the “Green Mile.”
Leaving the valley’s marijuana business where it’s now established is fine with Bob Armour, a longtime resident and former Vail mayor. Armour noted that Breckenridge has banned marijuana shops downtown and, through zoning, has required those businesses to move near the town’s airport.
“That’s farther away (from downtown Breckenridge) than Eagle-Vail is from here,” Armour said. Adding that Breckenridge, Telluride and Aspen have all approved retail marijuana, Armour said Vail can be different.
“We don’t need to be (those towns),” he said.
While most of the spoken and submitted comments were against Vail allowing retail marijuana operations, Avon resident Robert Takata argued passionately in favor of allowing it.
“Your (moratorium) extension is unacceptable,” Takata said. “It’s time to allow this.”
But council member Dale Bugby said this extension may lead to a final answer.
“Hopefully we’ll get to a permanent decision in a couple of months,” he said.
Vail Daily Business Editor Scott Miller can be reached at 970-748-2930, firstname.lastname@example.org or @scottnmiller.
Marijuana by the Numbers: 10 numbers about pot in Colorado that don't include 4-20April 20, 2015 —
Most Coloradans probably know that 4-20 — April 20 — has become the day for celebrating marijuana. Although the origin is still debated, four-twenty is probably the most popular numeric reference to pot. Rocky Mountain PBS I-News has compiled a list of less well-known figures, a paint by the numbers picture of cannabis in Colorado.
1. 71 percent
Recreational marijuana has been legal under state law for more than a year. But you can’t sell or legally buy cannabis in much of the state. Seventy-one percent of the state’s 321 jurisdictions ban all medical or retail marijuana dispensaries, according to Colorado’s Marijuana Enforcement Division.
There are 698 storefronts you can walk into to buy medical or retail marijuana as of this April 20, more than triple the number Starbucks (216) in the state.
In the Denver Metro Area, consumers can expect to pay around $228 dollars for an ounce of pot, according to a survey by the Colorado Pot Guide.
4. $90 million
Canna-business has generated $90 million in taxes, licenses and fees for the state since fiscal year 2013. That’s also almost as much money as Colorado taxpayers should expect next year in refunds ($94 million).
The cannabis industry has also created new jobs. There were 15,992 people licensed to work in the industry in February 2015. That’s about the same as the number of high school teachers in Colorado.
Last year the Marijuana Enforcement Division fined pot shops and producers $413,500 for violating regulations, including keeping workers licensed, staying within the legal limit of how much pot they can keep on hand and disposing of cannabis waste properly
Then there are medical patients who don’t go to licensed stores, but instead turn to caregivers, legal under Colorado law. Patients must still register with the state and get certified by a doctor. So far about 800 of the state’s 13,400 active physicians have signed medical marijuana cards for 114,290 patients.
It costs $15 to obtain a medical marijuana card this year. In 2007, it cost $110.
9. 4.8 million
In the first year of legalization in Colorado, consumers bought 4.8 million units of edible cannabis products, such as cookies or chocolates infused with THC.
Consumers bought 148,238 pounds of marijuana in Colorado last year — or more than 74 tons. According to our research, that’s heavy — weighing as much as about 24 Chevy Suburbans or eight Tyrannosaurus Rexes.
Colorado Department of Revenue, Marijuana Enforcement Division Annual Report (Feb. 27, 2015):https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/2014%20MED%20Annual%20Report_1.pdf
Medical Marijuana Registry Program Update (Feb. 28, 2015): https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/CHED_MMR_StatisticsReport_0215.pdf
Starbucks Investor Relations, Supplemental Financial Data:http://investor.starbucks.com/phoenix.zhtml?c=99518&p=irol-financialhighlights
Kaiser Family Foundation, State Health Facts: http://kff.org/other/state-indicator/total-active-physicians/
Marijuana Enforcement Division’s report on fines, suspensions and revocations of marijuana industry licenses during 2014: http://www.leg.state.co.us/library/reports.nsf/xsp/.ibmmodres/domino/OpenAttachment/library/reports.nsf/E9BF862A3853A743872579DD007B00F6/AttachReport/January%202015report.pdf
Department of Revenue report on Marijuana Taxes, Licenses, and Fees Transfers and Distribution: https://www.colorado.gov/pacific/sites/default/files/0215%20Marijuana%20Tax%2C%20License%2C%20and%20Fees%20Report.pdf
Study estimating T-Rex weight: http://www.livescience.com/16524-rex-dinosaur-weighed.html
Bureau of Labor Statistics estimates of number of secondary school teachers: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes_co.htm#39-0000
Colorado Pot Guide map of counties where marijuana is not allowed: https://www.coloradopotguide.com/where-to-buy-marijuana/
Public marijuana use problems level offDecember 22, 2014 —
VAIL — As more recreational marijuana dispensaries opened up in the area, some authorities and residents thought the problem of public smoking would become an increasingly visible problem. Instead, according to police and resort records, incidents of public consumption have not shown any significant increase over last year.
In Vail, the town has strict rules against using marijuana in public areas, and use is prohibited on the ski resorts, which is on federal U.S. Forest Service land. So far, there are no retail recreational marijuana stores in Vail, which has put a temporary moratorium on the businesses since retail shops became legal.
The Vail Police Department issued 19 public consumption citations so far this year, compared to 15 in 2013. The majority of those were issued in Vail Village and Lionshead Village. The citation in Vail results in a ticket that usually costs around $200 and a summons to court.
The Eagle County Sheriffs Office and Vail Mountain both also reported that they haven’t experienced any increase in public use problems.
“With the legalization back at the beginning of the year, you’d think the incidences would be pretty high, but I think they’re not because we’ve been writing those tickets and gotten the word out that it’s not OK,” said Office Justin Dill of the Vail Police Department.
The town of Vail has page on its site dedicated to answer common questions about Colorado marijuana law. In addition, the town has produced the information in postcard form, which are distributed to local lodges and on Vail Mountain.
Dill said it’s hard to say if the town of Vail is experiencing more or fewer public use instances than other mountain towns.
“Breckenridge has a much more lenient approach to the whole thing, and the council here has been extending the moratorium, so policies vary a lot town to town,” he said. “Our focus is to keep Vail as a destination resort that’s family friendly, and we’ve taken a pretty strong stance against it.”
Assistant Managing Editor Melanie Wong can be reached at 970-748-2927 or at email@example.com. Follow her on Twitter @mwongvail.
Granby moves to block marijuana shopDecember 5, 2014 —
A last-ditch effort by the Granby Board of Trustees to stop a marijuana business from opening in an unincorporated enclave could lead to a legal showdown.
The board will consider an emergency ordinance to annex a property that lies within an enclave on U.S. Highway 40 near Middle Park Medical Center-Granby at its Dec. 9 meeting.
Though marijuana businesses are allowed in unincorporated Grand County, Granby is seeking to annex the property before MMK Limited LLC can obtain a county license for its marijuana retail shop.
Granby contends that the business would “immediately and adversely affect the health, safety and welfare of the citizens of the town,” according to the ordinance.
A complaint filed in Grand County District Court, dated Nov. 28, seeks to halt the annexation, stating that the move violates state statutes.
Both MMK Limited LLC and the property owner, LTTK LLC, are listed as plaintiffs in the complaint, with the Granby mayor, clerk and board of trustees listed as defendants.
Granby Town Manager Wally Baird told the Sky-Hi News on Friday, Dec. 5, that the complaint had been withdrawn, though both the Grand County Clerk of Court’s office and an attorney for one of the plaintiffs said that it had not.
Rather, a hearing on the matter scheduled for Dec. 5 at 8:30 a.m. was postponed pending the outcome of the board meeting.
“If in fact the town does vote to do something patently unconstitutional, then we will revisit the hearing and reschedule the hearing,” said Bob Hoban of Denver-based law firm Hoban and Feola LLC, which is representing MMK Limited LLC in the case.
“Furthermore, it would be a terrible waste of the city’s resources to do this and fight this in court, and they will lose,” Hoban added.
Granby narrowly voted against medical marijuana dispensaries in 2010, with roughly 53 percent of voters backing prohibition. In 2012, both districts encompassing Granby voted in favor of Amendment 64, which legalized recreational marijuana in Colorado.
Baird said the town’s decision to ban recreational marijuana businesses in May of this year was based on an informal poll taken during public hearings on the subject, in which 98 people supported prohibiting marijuana businesses and two did not. Baird pointed out that the two against prohibiting marijuana businesses were not Granby residents.
“You’re telling me those people can’t find a better place to put a marijuana store than in an island within the town of Granby that doesn’t want it there to begin with?,” Baird said.
Baird contended that legislative action, including the town’s move to annex, couldn’t be enjoined, though Hoban disagreed.
“There are a number of cases where legislative action has been enjoined,” Hoban said.
The lot in question is located within an enclave, though it only shares one border with Granby. Its other contiguous properties are also unincorporated.
This could be problematic for Granby, which seeks only to annex the single property, and Hoban said that the case could very well hinge on the court’s interpretation of enclave.
Case echoes earlier annexation threat
This isn’t the first time that MMK Limited LLC and Granby have clashed over land use in an enclave.
The Grand County Planning Commission voted not to grant MMK a special use permit for another unincorporated property near the intersection of U.S. Highway 40 and U.S. Highway 34 after Granby expressed its intent to annex that property.
The county planning department had recommended approval.
The complaint filed by MMK contends that Granby abandoned its plans to annex the property after MMK withdrew its request from the Grand County Board of Commissioners to grant the permit.
Baird said that the town had not abandoned those plans and would likely have a hearing on the annexation in January 2015.
“Both of these places that we’re looking at are enclaves,” Baird said. “So if the town has generally spoken and said, ‘we don’t want this in the town,’ the board feels like it’s their responsibility to make sure that doesn’t happen in the town.”
Annexation move draws ire abroad
It seems that Granby’s moves to keep marijuana out of town haven’t gone unnoticed.
A Dec. 4 article in Westword magazine, titled “Marijuana-Hating Town’s Extreme Efforts to Block a Pot Shop,” is highly critical of Granby’s strategy, going so far as to name Granby a contender for the “doobie-ous” title of “the Colorado town that most hates pot.”
Hank Shell can be reached at 970-887-3334 ext. 19610.
Fraser green lights second retail marijuana storeDecember 4, 2014 —
It looks like Fraser is going to get a little greener this winter.
The town’s board of trustees unanimously approved a license for a new retail marijuana store in Fraser at its Thursday, Dec. 4, meeting.
Growhouse Fraser LLC, Grand County’s second licensed marijuana business, will occupy an approximately 1,900 square-foot suite upstairs in the Alco Shopping Center.
The new store, which has already acquired its state license, is slated to open in late December, said owner Craig Clark. It will not include a grow operation and will only offer retail marijuana sales, Clark said.
Clark, a Denver-based attorney and former Marine with Grand County roots, said he hopes other business owners can benefit from his new store, whether it be from cross promotion or simply increased traffic through the Alco center.
“We want to open a shop that supports the community,” Clark said.
During the hearing, other local business owners echoed Clark’s hopes for a symbiotic relationship and expressed minimal concerns.
Dennis Finnigan’s business, Fraser Valley Photo, sits just below Clark’s suite. Finnigan said he had some reservations about traffic on the stairs to and from the store, but said he was hopeful that both businesses could coexist.
“I hope it works, and I hope that we all can benefit from it in one way or the other,” Finnigan said.
Clark Lipscomb, representing the nearby Grand Park development and Byers Peak Ranch, questioned whether the new marijuana shop was too close to an approved school site on the Byers Peak Ranch property, and whether it was too close to another Grand Park property along U.S. Highway 40 that could house a retail marijuana store in the future.
Town ordinances dictate that marijuana businesses cannot be located within 1,000 feet of a school or 500 feet of each other. The town determined that Clark’s shop exceeded the requisite distance in both instances.
The approval marks the latest victory for entrepreneurs hoping to tap in to Grand County’s marijuana market. Despite countywide approval for Amendment 64 in 2012, most towns in Grand County have banned marijuana businesses within their borders. Only Fraser and unincorporated Grand County allow such businesses, and only the county allows grow operations.
Craig told the board that, if his business were successful, he would consider expanding his presence in the county.
“If we create a viable business in the town of Fraser, we would evaluate creating our own wholesale or supply facility as well, somewhere,” Clark said.
Hot Sulphur voters support marijuana bansNovember 6, 2014 —
On Tuesday residents of Hot Sulphur Springs affirmed their support for the existing ban on marijuana-related facilities in the town.
Folks in Hot Sulphur Springs were presented with six ballot measures on the ballot exclusively in their community.
Advisory Questions 2C, 2D, 2E and 2F asked residents if they supported the existing town bans on retail marijuana stores, marijuana cultivation facilities (growhouses/greenhouses), marijuana product manufacturing facilities and marijuana testing facilities.
The four advisory questions were intended to provide town trustees with constituent opinions regarding the bans and to inform any future decisions the trustees might make regarding the ban on marijuana facilities.
Additionally, Ballot Issue 2A and 2B asked residents if they approved of the town passing a sales tax and an excise tax on retail marijuana products and cultivation facilities in the event the Board of Trustees allowed such facilities within Hot Sulphur Springs.
Ballot Issue 2A and 2B and the taxes proposed in them were applicable if, and only if, marijuana facilities were to be approved by the Trustees at a later date.
While the Board of Trustees retains the ability to allow marijuana facilities in their community, if the results of the election are any indication, they will not be approving such facilities anytime soon.
Residents approved of the existing ban on retail marijuana facilities with 195 yes votes and 139 no votes. Voters also supported the town ban on marijuana cultivation facilities with 209 yes votes and 123 no votes. Likewise the Hot Sulphur Springs’ bans on marijuana product manufacturing facilities and marijuana testing facilities were supported by voters with Question 2E receiving 201 yes votes to 133 no votes and Question 2F taking 212 yes votes to 121 no votes.
Ballot Issues 2A and 2B were also voted down, though by much closer margins with Issue 2A receiving 154 yes votes to 175 no votes and 2B receiving 152 yes votes to 175 no votes.
Is marijuana revitalizing Eagle-Vail?November 1, 2014 —
EAGLE-VAIL — Can marijuana revitalize Eagle-Vail’s commercial district? Whatever the answer ultimately is, the marijuana business is growing — and bringing more people to — a stretch of U.S. Highway 6 some are already calling the “Green Mile.”
By Nov. 8, there will be three medical and three recreational marijuana businesses in the mile or so east of the stoplight at U.S. Highway 6 and Eagle Road. Two of the medical businesses have been in the valley since about 2009. The recreational businesses have all opened just this year.
Native Roots, in the back of the former Route 6 Cafe building, was the first to open. There, general manager Grant Troeger said business has been anywhere from good to crazy. After the store opened in early August, as many as 500 people per day would come in.
Four people came in during a 10-minute visit to the store on a recent early evening.
Just to the west, a new store, Rocky Road, is set to open Nov. 8. Both Native Roots and Rocky Road are parts of larger companies — the third shop, Roots Rx, is locally owned. But Native Roots and Rocky Road seem to reflect two approaches to the business.
Native Roots is in a more bare-bones space. The employees are friendly and the shelves are well-stocked, but the decor is simple.
Rocky Road seems aimed at destination guests, with plenty of wood and stone on the walls and floors. About half the store can also be shut off from the other half. The idea is if a well-heeled guests calls ahead and asks to stay out of sight of other clients, he or she can be ushered in through the back door for a discrete visit.
More to come?
The three current recreational businesses in Eagle-Vail could be joined soon by another two. In all, Eagle County will make eight recreational licenses available — five in Eagle-Vail, one in Edwards and another two in the Roaring Fork Valley.
Is that too much?
Putnam Pierman, of Rocky Road, doesn’t think so.
“There’s actually very little competition when you think of all the bars and liquor stores around,” Pierman said.
While Rocky Road has taken an upscale approach, Pierman said that business intends to rely on local customers. Those are the people who will recommend the business to concierges and visitors. Troeger added that local residents will keep businesses running between tourist seasons.
Greg Honan has operated the Herbal Elements medical marijuana dispensary since 2009. Herbal Elements’ recreational license is still in the lengthy, expensive approval process, but Honan said that’s a part of the business his shop needs to get into soon.
Asked about the growth of the business in Eagle-Vail, Honan said there are both opportunities and challenges for his business.
The opportunities include being able to work with, and share ideas with, other operators. For Honan, opportunity also exists in his growing business, which is based in Eagle-Vail, and is able to expand as state regulations evolve.
Honan noted there are several advantages to keeping a medical license, as well as a permit to buy medical marijuana.
Medical customers can be as young as 18, while recreational marijuana is limited to those 21 and older. Medical marijuana purchasers also are exempt from the 25 percent state tax on recreational products.
Honan said state and local officials at some point will have to re-evaluate the level of taxation on recreational marijuana. Taxes, and the difficulty and expense of applying for permits and licenses have kept many black-market growers and sellers from going into the legal-marijuana business, he said.
Some of those requirements include plenty of education. Troeger and Rocky Road manager Suzannah Tarpey both said educating customers is a crucial part of their jobs, especially when it comes to visitors.
That education includes a lot of talking to people about the need to take it easy with edible products — which can take an hour or more to take effect.
Tarpey, a longtime veteran of the Vail restaurant and bar business, said she’s seen people on the floor after eating too much.
Longtime Eagle-Vail business Thurston Kitchen and Bath is two doors down from Rocky Road. There, designer Ken Jones said the new neighbors have created a clean, efficient space.
“They’re handling it well,” Jones said. “And anything that puts more people on our sidewalk is good.”
At the Route 6 Cafe, owner Ollie Holdstock said he’s been happy with what he’s seen so far.
Holdstock said marijuana has been a part of life in the Vail Valley in the 30-plus years he’s lived here. The sales taxes — the state’s portion of which are dedicated to school construction — are also nice to have, he said.
Holdstock said his business is up in the last six months, although whether that has anything to do with the marijuana business isn’t clear.
“But Eagle-Vail was a dying entity before they came,” Holdstock said. “Businesses are moving in again.”
And, he said, people who come to buy marijuana products might just stop in for a burger and a beer while they’re in the neighborhood.
At Native Roots, the old business area seems to be going through a burst of activity. In addition to the deli and gas station out front, a brewery is being established right next door, and a Crossfit studio has opened up across the parking lot.
“Every single company here has come in to tell us, ‘People know where we are now,’” Troeger said.
Growers abandon $8.3 million in illegal potOctober 8, 2014 —
GYPSUM – Just because pot is legal in Colorado does not mean you can grow it on someone else’s land.
In the last week, illegal growers walked away from 3,630 marijuana plants worth as much as $8.3 million in marijuana, 1,000 in Eagle County near Cottonwood Pass south of Gypsum, and 2,630 plants near Ruedi Reservoir in Pitkin County.
A hunter trekking in the Cottonwood Pass area south of Gypsum found the around 1,000 pot plants growing on private land Oct. 1. The hunter did not strap any of it to the hood of his truck, as hunters used to do with their quarry, but instead notified the Eagle County Sheriff’s Office.
When deputies arrived, they found an elaborate irrigation system bringing life-giving fluids to the 1,000 pot plants. They also found a campsite nearby.
Deputies hid and watched for a long time, but no suspects showed up to harvest their crop. Eventually, because the plants would have to be harvested before the frost, and because it has already begun to frost at night, deputies decided no one was coming to claim the makeshift pot plantation. So deputies confiscated and destroyed all of the marijuana plants.
The landowner did not know the pot was there, the Sheriff’s Office said, and was happy when it was gone.
With perfect conditions outdoors, a mature pot plant can yield up to around 18 ounces, according to The Weed Blog.
If those 1,000 plants all yielded 18 ounces, at $196 per ounce for medium grade weed according to priceofweed.com, the growers would have yielded $352,000.
The case remains under investigation, the Sheriff’s Office said in a written statement.
Pitkin pot connection?
It’s not clear whether the Cottonwood Pass pot plantation was related to the Ruedi Reservoir reefer in Pitkin County found last week, but investigators are looking for connections, said Jessie Mosher, public information with the Eagle County Sheriff’s Office.
The Pitkin County pot plantation near Ruedi was on public land, and growers walked away from a crop worth between $6 million and $8 million, said Scott Fitzwilliams, forest supervisor with the White River National Forest.
Forest Service workers pulled 2,630 plants out of the ground and destroyed them.
That site was also found by hunters, Fitzwilliams said.
That growing operation was simple but effective, Fitzwilliams said. A “check dam” on a nearby creek created a water source for irrigation. A gravity-fed piping system delivered water to the site.
The pot plants, which were up to 6 feet tall, were growing in three or four clumps in natural clearings between subalpine fir and aspen trees in an area smaller than 2 acres, Fitzwilliams said.
The Forest Service is keeping the exact location under wraps while it finishes its investigation.
In September 2013, an illegal operation was found near Hayes Creek in the Redstone area, worth more than $8 million. Forest Service officials yanked 3,375 marijuana plants out of the ground.
Since 2009, 34 illegal marijuana grow sites and more than 65,000 marijuana plants have been eradicated from national forests in Colorado.
The agency estimates the plants produce an average of 1 pound of marijuana per plant.
While Colorado voters approved use of recreational marijuana, the federal government still views pot as illegal, the agency said in a statement.
Staff Writer Randy Wyrick can be reached at 970-748-2935 or firstname.lastname@example.org.
Retail pot shop opens in Eagle-VailAugust 4, 2014 —
EAGLE COUNTY — The Vail Valley’s second retail marijuana shop opens Monday. There will be more in the coming months.
Eagle’s Sweet Leaf Pioneer has been open since spring, and another shop is planned. While every other town in the valley has either banned or delayed licensing for new retail shops, a number of shops are planned for Edwards and Eagle-Vail, both in unincorporated Eagle County.
The first of those shops, Native Roots, opens Monday in Eagle-Vail, in the back part of the building that once housed the Route 6 Cafe.
When Eagle County finished its regulations for retail shops, Native Roots — a Front Range-based company with medical dispensaries and retail shops in Boulder and Denver — was already in the midst of working through an application for a medical dispensary at the Eagle-Vail site.
Scot Hunn, a senior planner with the county who focuses on marijuana license applications, said that head start helped Native Roots get open first.
It’s a complex process to obtain a retail license. A potential operator first has to clear all of the state’s myriad requirements. After that, it’s time to meet the county’s licensing requirements. Before a license is issued and sales can start, the operator of a dispensary or retail store also has to go through an extensive building-permit process.
Hunn said an operator must submit plans that include everything from security to ventilation.
“They have to show us on paper that they can provide a solution to potential problems,” Hunn said.
That building permit approval is important for stores or dispensaries in multi-unit buildings, so neighbors aren’t affected by odors, but Hunn said the requirements are especially important for growing operations, which create more odors than shops.
Final license approval is granted after a final inspection, and licenses must be renewed every year, pending inspections.
Hunn said at the moment another five licenses are pending for this part of the county, with two in process for the potion of the county in the Roaring Fork Valley.
Three of those licenses were reserved for the three existing medical dispensaries in the valley. Hunn said there were eight applicants for the remaining three licenses. All of those recreational license-holders are now working through the approval process, Hunn said. One of the two businesses currently based in Edwards is working on a move to Eagle-Vail in the name of finding a larger space.
Native Roots co-owner Rhett Jordan said his company was attracted to the valley by a couple of things — opportunity, and the fact he’s been coming here since he was a kid growing up in the Denver area.
“The Vail Valley’s been a big part of my life, and when we heard Eagle (county) was going recreational, we decided to come.”
While a recreational license will certainly attract tourists, Jordan said the medical part of Native Roots’ business remains its top priority.
That business has changed significantly since dispensaries began opening quickly in 2009. That rush followed a U.S. Department of Justice directive to essentially ignore those businesses, although marijuana possession, sale and consumption is a federal crime. Another directive a couple of years later essentially reined in the dispensary business. Jordan said the number of dispensaries in the state has dropped from a high of more than 1,200 to just more than 500 today.
Jordan said the people left in the business today tend to be more professional.
“The industry has really started to shift — I think we all wanted to create something bigger and stronger.”
And, like others in the industry, Jordan believes that if Colorado sets a good example in the wake of the 2012 ballot issue that legalized recreational use in the state, it could bode well for legalization in other states, too.
But is five shops in Eagle-Vail too much? Jordan said Eagle County might have “overshot the market a little to get more competition.”
As the number of recreational stores multiplies, it will be interesting to see who survives.
Vail Daily Business Editor Scott Miller can be reached at 970-748-2930, email@example.com or @scottnmiller.
Grand County puts off Highland Lumber rezoning decisionJuly 15, 2014 —
The Grand County commissioners decided to table a proposal to rezone the former Highland Lumber building on U.S. Highway 40 in Tabernash, which might become a medical-marijuana grow facility.
Wells Fargo Bank took ownership of the 11-acre parcel and building after foreclosing on the owner.
Realtor Lance Gutersohn, who represented Wells Fargo, is seeking to rezone the land from tourist to business.
The property is already under contract with a potential buyer who intends to turn the facility into a medical marijuana grow operation, Gutersohn said. Whether the buyer closes on the contract is contingent on rezoning, county and state licensure, and other factors.
But during the July 15 meeting, dialogue focused on the building’s potential future use rather than rezoning the property.
Ron Jones, owner of Miller Storage, which adjoins the Highland Lumber property, expressed concerns about the county’s marijuana regulations.
“I’m concerned about the uses that are allowed within the business zone,” said Jones. “And I realize that medical marijuana grow facilities are one of those uses and I’m not here to speak about medical marijuana grow facilities as a pro or a con, but I’m concerned about the regulations that we have in place.”
Jones argued that, because the rezoning would allow the potential use of the of a medical marijuana facility, it was germane to the discussion.
“Believe me, I have done enough networking,” Jones said. “There’s a huge concern in the community about marijuana grow facilities as it relates to odor, as it relates to lighting and as it relates to noise.”
The adjacent property is already zoned business, and both the Grand County Planning and Zoning Department and the Grand County Planning Commission recommended that the county commissioners grant the rezoning request.
“We believe that it complies with all of the requirements within our rezoning request,” said Kristen Manguso, Grand County planning director.
But Jones said the putative use of the property warranted consideration in the zoning hearing.
“This particular property is located very close to a number of residential uses. And even though there is business use next door and that I very well may give business use to my property next door, we as a community need to be concerned about the impact this will have,” Jones said.
Jones said that the county should take an extra week to consider requiring a special use permit for the property.
“The special use permit does not create any undue burden on an applicant for this type of facility,” Jones said. “We all live up here. To the best of my knowledge, nobody who’s applying for these grow facilities lives up here. They’re not invested in the community so therefore shouldn’t we take our time? Shouldn’t we have local control over this use?”
However, resident David Michel didn’t agree with Jones’s view.
“I think that sometimes people speak from a position of ignorance because they don’t know regulations that are already imposed by both the state and the county,” Michel said. “Ignorance breeds fear and fear breeds conjecture as to all sorts of horribles that may occur but likely will not occur.”
Michel asked that commissioners grant the rezoning request.
Gutersohn reiterated that he didn’t believe the discussion regarding marijuana was pertinent to the issue at hand.
“If in fact this marijuana thing does shut down, it’s all the more reason for us to have that business zoning, so that if for some reason there’s somebody that wants to bring a business to Grand County and buy that property, then they’ll be able to do that,” Gutersohn said. “The marijuana thing doesn’t have anything to do with our request here. We’re looking for business zoning for this building.”
Commissioner James Newberry asked if all uses would be grandfathered in under the zoning change. County Attorney Jack DiCola advised that the county could take the issue under advisement with notice and could declare a moratorium with regard to zoning code matters.
“However, I believe that the current regulations, both under the business district zone and our marijuana licensing, will cover anything that you want to cover,” DiCola said. “There are a number of uses in the business zone from warehouse facilities to nurseries to commercial greenhouses, eating and drinking establishments, construction businesses — a lot of issues here — but none of those have impacts outside of the zone.”
Commissioners were unable to reach an understanding on how to proceed. They will revisit the matter on July 22.
Hank Shell can be reached at 970-887-3334 ext. 19610.
Grand County planning board says no to proposed marijuana grow facilityJuly 15, 2014 —
Grand County Planning Commission voted four to two against issuing a special use permit for a proposed marijuana grow facility near Granby.
The Department of Planning and Zoning recommended the commission approve the permit.
“We do have to recommend approval on this,” said Kristen Manguso, the county’s planning director, citing the support of Grand County voters for recreational marijuana.
“The voting record shows that the majority of people, even if it’s one more than the minority, are in support of marijuana,” Manguso said.
The property, currently owned by Granby Realty Partners, LLC., is located adjacent to Neils Lunceford landscaping near the intersection of U.S. Highway 40 and U.S. Highway 34.
The proposed facility would have created one to five jobs and initially grown 200 plants, though later modifications would have expanded its capacity to between 500 and 900 plants, said Kevin Speier, the co-owner and CEO of MMK Limited, the Denver-based company which sought to build the facility.
Concerns over lighting, odor, proximity to Granby
During the hearing, commissioners expressed concern about the plant odor the facility would produce.
Speier said the facility would have a triple carbon filtration system that would eliminate most odors.
Some commissioners were also concerned that the facility would be too near to Granby, which expressed its intent to force annexation of the area in a last-minute letter from Town Manager Wally Baird to the commissioners.
“The Town Board has approved a motion for the Town Staff to begin the process of annexing the property as an enclave,” wrote Baird. “Since the Town does not allow for the propagation, processing, or sale of marijuana products or plants, the activity at the site would be required to cease as a part of the Town.”
Some commissioners also expressed concern about the intrusiveness of lighting at the facility, though Manguso noted that the facility is already in a heavily lit area.
MMK Limited can still appeal the planning commission’s decision with the board of county commissioners.
Speier told the Sky-Hi News it was a possibility, though legally he could not say for sure.
Grand County Commissioners adopted an ordinance regulating marijuana facilities in the county in January 2014.
Planning commissioners Ingrid Karlstrom and Steve DiSciullo were the only members of the board who voted to approve the permit.
Hank Shell can be reached at 970-887-3334 ext. 19610.
Grand County commissioners to hear marijuana permit requestJuly 14, 2014 —
The Grand County commissioners will conduct a public hearing regarding a special use permit for a marijuana cultivation facility near Granby.
The board will consider the application on Tuesday, July 22, in the Grand County Administration Building in Hot Sulphur Springs.
The Grand County Planning Commission denied a special use permit for the same applicant, Kevin Speier, during its July 9 meeting.
Speier had applied for a special use permit to grow recreational marijuana in the former Mountain Parks Electric warehouse building north of the intersection of U.S. Highway 40 and U.S. Highway 34.
Vail pot moratorium moves forwardJuly 5, 2014 —
VAIL — While resort towns elsewhere were quick to jump into retail marijuana sales, Vail continues its wait-and-see approach.
The Vail Town Council Tuesday unanimously passed on first reading an ordinance that will extend the town’s current moratorium on retail marijuana sales in town. The town had been working through the spring on perhaps making a final decision on whether or not to ban retail sales in town, facing a self-imposed July 31 deadline.
The town formed a “working group” to evaluate the issue, but it became clear to council members that more time would be needed, which led to the new ordinance.
While council members all voted for the ordinance — which requires one more vote before final passage — they did raise questions.
Council member Greg Moffet asked whether Vail might be depriving itself of revenue to handle “potential problems” related to retail sales, since those sales are currently allowed in nearby Eagle-Vail. Moffet noted that there are Craigslist ads offering delivery services into Vail.
On the other hand, Moffet said, initial reports from other resort towns indicate there have been few, if any, law enforcement problems.
Council member Jenn Bruno suggested that town officials have some in-depth conversations with their counterparts in Aspen during a get-together later this month.
Vail voters in 2012 overwhelmingly approved Amendment 64, the state constitutional amendment that legalized possession and use of small amounts of marijuana and laid the foundation for retail sales. But a more recent survey showed a majority of town residents oppose allowing retail sales in town.
Silverthorne Town Council votes to extend hours for retail marijuana shopsJune 26, 2014 —
People looking to purchase marijuana in Silverthorne after sundown are now in luck.
On Wednesday night, the Silverthorne Town Council unanimously approved an ordinance extending the hours of operation at retail marijuana shops. Shops can now operate from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m. Prior town code required them to lock up by 7 p.m.
“I’d like to put our marijuana shop on equal footing with everyone else,” said Mayor Pro Tem Ann-Marie Sandquist. “And (the shop) has been very good working with the town council and with the police department.”
Mayor Bruce Butler agreed.
“The fact they’ve been such a good actor makes it easier to do this,” he said.
State law allows retail marijuana shops to be open as late as midnight. But local governments can establish their own regulations, such as hours of operation, as long as they fall within the state law.
Town officials said the chief motivation behind the time change was to give the town’s only marijuana shop, High Country Healing, a chance to remain open as late as surrounding businesses.
“There is a liquor store right next to us that can be open until at least 10 p.m.,” said Colby Hockersmith, general manager at High Country Healing. “It didn’t make sense for us to have to close so early while several other businesses in the same center can remain open for hours longer. This gives us an opportunity to serve more customers.”
When the council originally approved the sale of retail marijuana it adopted the same hours that had applied to medical dispensaries, which accounted for the 7 p.m. closing time.
The change also puts Silverthorne’s retail marijuana regulations more in line with other towns in the county. Breckenridge, for example, allows retail marijuana stores to operate from 8 a.m. to 10 p.m. Monday through Sunday.
“We’ve had the same hours in place since Jan. 1,” said Kim Dykstra-DiLallo, Breckenridge’s communication director. “They can be open at any time in that window. It’s up to each business to decide.”
Now Silverthorne residents and visitors will have a chance to frequent their local marijuana shop under the stars as High Country Healing has changed its hours from 10 a.m. to 10 p.m.
Vail bans retail pot another yearJune 17, 2014 —
VAIL — The Vail town council voted unanimously to extend its temporary ban on retail marijuana for another year in order to gather more information and observe other towns such as Aspen, who have legalized retail sales.
The town had set a self-imposed July 31 deadline to make a decision on retail sales, but council members said the past year has raised too many questions, with not enough time to answer all of them.
“I hate putting off decisions, but this is a new thing for our state,” said council member Dave Chapin. “However, we do need to make a decision within a year. Maybe we should also throw the question out there to people who come here to visit and see what they think.”
More time needed
Colorado Constitutional Amendment 64 legalized the sale and consumption of recreational marijuana in Colorado. The legislation grants local governments the authority to regulate the operations of recreational marijuana establishments, including prohibition, if desired. It passed in Vail with 75 percent in favor.
Confusingly enough, a recent community survey showed that while the majority of residents may have voted for Amendment 64, much fewer residents are in favor of allowing retail pot shops in Vail.
The survey by RRC Associates showed that when asked if they would be in favor of a retail marijuana store in Vail, 31 percent said “yes,” 57 percent said “no” and 13 percent were “unsure.”
Earlier this year, the town of Vail formed a Recreational Marijuana Working Group to identify a list of questions and issues that the town council should consider prior to adopting a marijuana policy. The group, after two meetings that also drew the attention and attendance of many local residents, prepared a list of nearly 60 questions surrounding the topic.
“We want to answer these questions, but I don’t think we can possibly do justice to either side of the debate with the time we have before the ban expires,” said council member Margaret Rogers. “We don’t have to rush into this by any means.”
Council members particularly liked the idea of observing other areas that have allowed retail sales over the next year. Aspen, Summit County and Eagle County all either currently have or soon will have retail marijuana shops.
“It doesn’t look like there are any problems so far, but it’s so new, and we just don’t know yet,” said Rogers.
Resident weigh in
The community survey, while it presented confusing numbers for officials, did show a strong divide in opinion between age groups, and second homeowners and full-time residents.
For the question of allowing a retail pot shop in Vail, if the answers were divided between age groups, those who were in their 30s or younger were overwhelmingly in favor, while those 65 and older were staunchly against.
One Eagle County resident, Barbara Allen, said that the town would not be in line with its support of health and wellness if it allowed retail marijuana.
“You either support wellness or don’t. And supporting marijuana is not,” she said. “My other issue is safety and being family friendly. If other ski areas adopt this but Vail doesn’t, those people will come here and Vail can bill itself as family friendly.”
Retail marijuana in Eagle County
Outside of Vail, eight retail licenses are currently being considered in Eagle County. Of those, five are in Eagle-Vail’s commercial area, one of the few areas with the proper zoning and setbacks in the county.
County Manager Keith Montag said that some anecdotal evidence and research is showing that counties that have allowed retail marijuana aren’t necessarily seeing the problems they expected.
“We were at a counties conference, and it seems like from people we’ve talked to, especially over at Summit County, they’re not seeing the problems we’ve debated about,” said Montag.
County officials said that they’ve even seen some studies that indicate legalizing marijuana might actually have positive effects.
One study showed that the number of vehicle fatalities and underage use had actually gone down in areas that legalized marijuana, suggesting that people might be substituting marijuana for alcohol, or that people were choosing to stay at home and use marijuana instead of going out.
Assistant Managing Editor Melanie Wong can be reached at 970-748-2927 or at firstname.lastname@example.org.
Public hearing on retail pot in Vail is TuesdayJune 16, 2014 —
VAIL — A public hearing has been scheduled during the Tuesday, June 17 Vail Town Council meeting to continue discussions regarding policy options on the topic of retail marijuana sales. The item is listed sixth on the meeting agenda, which begins at 6 p.m. in the Vail Town Council Chambers.
The Vail Town Council will be reviewing a list of nearly 60 questions and issues forwarded by members of a 16-member working group that has been convened by the town to explore the topic. Representing various organizations throughout the community, the working group has met twice to help shape the public policy discussion.
Passage of Amendment 64 by Colorado voters in 2012 establishes a wide spectrum of options for local governments to consider, ranging from a prohibition on the operation of retail establishments to regulations reflecting the extent allowed by state law. A moratorium is currently in place, adopted previously by the town council, which bans retail sales in Vail. The moratorium expires on July 31.
During the meeting, Community Development Director George Ruther will present an update on the working group’s activities, review results from the Town of Vail community survey and provide information on retail sales policy decisions that have been made in surrounding jurisdictions. Following Ruther’s update, members of the public will be invited to offer their opinions and suggestions.
The discussion will be used to determine next steps in the information gathering process and to formulate a formal recommendation to the town council.